CARL wrote:
I don't have a problem with reconstructed sites as long as it is as faithful and accurate as possible.
I agree although sometimes it may be better not to know that it's been reconstructed as long as it is true to form as I find it take the 'edge' off it for me. It is also nice to visit a site to see what it would have looked like in its prime (as close as possible)
Something is certainly better than nothing!