I can't beieve Mark Horton saying
"Firstly, on re-erection, many archaeologists think what Keiller did at Avebury was wrong (for those who don't realise, many of the stones at Avebury were re-erected by Keiller in the 1920's) and that much evidence was lost in the process, and was certainly something that we didn't want to be associated with! "
WTF? First time I've EVER heard anything bad said about Keillers work at Avebury!
PeteG