close
more_vert

There’s a crafty bit of rationalisation in the Castleden book , initially he says “there was a lowland route connecting Skara Brae with the ceremonial centre on the isthmus “ then in the same paragraph the route becomes “, the road turned east along the southern shore of the Loch of Harray …..” . We can all find routes but a bit more difficult to find an actual road .
He also mentions the Sarsen Road from Avebury to Stonehenge ( in the same chapter ) equally as subjective and with no archaeological evidence to support it at the time of writing (1987).

See what you mean. He seems to find "routes" everywhere. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=UWCIAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA116&lpg=PA116&dq=%22Sarsen+Road%22+from+Avebury+to+Stonehenge&source=bl&ots=K1r_Gwxzyi&sig=hWWEM0I-RQNNGfB-l4jcoV6rH4Y&hl=en&sa=X&ei=44i6U4PQDMmV0AXR2oD4Cg&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Sarsen%20Road%22%20from%20Avebury%20to%20Stonehenge&f=false

Cheers George. "there was a lowland route connecting Skara brae with the ceremonial centre.." Essentially meaningless. As you say, we can all find routes from one place to another. There is (or 'was' to make it sound revealing, particular) a route connecting every single place in the country.
Completely misleading when combined with 'road' in the same paragraph.