close
more_vert

Bloody hell George: K15. How could you possibly guess that?

No idea who at this stage or even if it'll be of interest. Now that the Stonehenge set is more or less done, just offering out the idea like last time, but at a much slower pace: I had more time spare back then, but it still took three years! I have no idea what qualifies as a reasonable evidence set for this purpose so don't know how it'll be seen: I thought Combe Hill was very weak (even considered deleting it because it looked too speculative to me) but it seems to have been picked out by others as strong. K13 is absolutely fine, but a bit messy; almost as if someone wanted to bring everything they thought important into one, but didn't properly plan out how they were going to do that.

[quote="jonmor"]Bloody hell George: K15. How could you possibly guess that?

Dowsing . (gets coat)

I have no idea what qualifies as a reasonable evidence set for this purpose so don't know how it'll be seen:

That's what is of interest ,a clue to what the evidence might be .


K13 is absolutely fine, but a bit messy; almost as if someone wanted to bring everything they thought important into one, but didn't properly plan out how they were going to do that.

That is also of interest , what is the criteria that considers it messy ? , why assume what was important for the engraver(s) ? ,why assume that the engravings are representations of important concepts to the engraver and some might include more concepts than others ? why assume the engraving was pre-planned ?
Sorry lots of Q's , but hoping to get to the basis of it .