close
more_vert

jonmor wrote:
There's one complex motif that seems overly developed to my eyes.

Will let you know what response I get!

Jon , the use of “over developed “ seems inappropriate when we don’t know the intent , meaning , if any , or limits , is it not just more ornate or possessing a greater number of different motifs from others ? My guess is K 15 but 13 is arguably even more complex .

Can you say who is getting access to the idea to allow a response ?

tiompan wrote:
jonmor wrote:
There's one complex motif that seems overly developed to my eyes.

Will let you know what response I get!

Jon , the use of “over developed “ seems inappropriate when we don’t know the intent , meaning , if any , or limits , is it not just more ornate or possessing a greater number of different motifs from others ? My guess is K 15 but 13 is arguably even more complex .

Can you say who is getting access to the idea to allow a response ?

From the archaeologists named and the other bits and pieces, got the site, can't wait to hear the theory.

Bloody hell George: K15. How could you possibly guess that?

No idea who at this stage or even if it'll be of interest. Now that the Stonehenge set is more or less done, just offering out the idea like last time, but at a much slower pace: I had more time spare back then, but it still took three years! I have no idea what qualifies as a reasonable evidence set for this purpose so don't know how it'll be seen: I thought Combe Hill was very weak (even considered deleting it because it looked too speculative to me) but it seems to have been picked out by others as strong. K13 is absolutely fine, but a bit messy; almost as if someone wanted to bring everything they thought important into one, but didn't properly plan out how they were going to do that.