nigelswift wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
I'm just not keen on seeing another round of 'yes, we all know who thinks what', spread over 2 million pages. A lot of it is just pointless drivel.
So let them carry on and don't complain about it, that's what that amounts to. On TMA of all places!
No it doesn't amount to that, at all. As i've explained above.
Its just not a very effective way to communicate to people like the man I saw climbing Silbury the last time I was down there or the man on the Swindon stone. All it does is cause petty arguments, and i'm starting to think that may very well be the reason its regenerated here in such a predictable and relentless fashion.
There are thousands of monuments in the UK, so much to start a discussion about. So many avenues to explore. But nobody does here. We even get complaints about huge, well funded surveys by universities, attempting to include the general public. Its a joke. I think I may have to join the ranks of the TMA survivors, and boot my own sorry backside out of here, because this forum is not a good representation of the intelligent, enthusiastic and ever-growing community interested in archaeology and these sites.