climbing of sacred hills

close
more_vert
Evergreen Dazed E
Evergreen Dazed Jul 9, 2013 15:53:08
Replying to nigelswift

nigelswift wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
Do we really have to have the same endless, boring, dead-end argument about the climbing of ancient hills on this forum?

I'm beginning to feel this place is like a hellish coffee morning for the perpetually dissatisfied or the unimaginatively disgruntled.

So being against climbing Silbury when requested not to is unimaginative?
No, but the repetitive nature of these threads on this forum is very unimaginative. I'm just not keen on seeing another round of 'yes, we all know who thinks what', spread over 2 million pages. A lot of it is just pointless drivel.

L Littlestone
Littlestone Jul 9, 2013 16:02:22
Replying to Evergreen Dazed

Evergreen Dazed wrote:
No, but the repetitive nature of these threads on this forum is very unimaginative. I'm just not keen on seeing another round of 'yes, we all know who thinks what', spread over 2 million pages. A lot of it is just pointless drivel.
Well, as I said above, the simple solution is not to read it. It might be worth remembering though that there are new readers and contributors coming here all the time and the issue may be one they have not considered before.

N nigelswift
nigelswift Jul 9, 2013 16:09:17
Replying to Evergreen Dazed

Evergreen Dazed wrote:
I'm just not keen on seeing another round of 'yes, we all know who thinks what', spread over 2 million pages. A lot of it is just pointless drivel.
So let them carry on and don't complain about it, that's what that amounts to. On TMA of all places!