Hill-fort Survey

close

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-23203500

Professor Lock was on Irish radio this morning about this. Don't want to sound negative but in Ireland the majority of this information is available on www.archaeology.ie or have been field-walked. Not really sure what he is hoping to achieve with this? Surely the majority of hill-forts have already been recorded?

It is a fascinating subject and exciting project. It is true some hill forts have been extensively excavated, for example Danebury, with so much learnt from those excavations. The small museum in Andover which is more or less dedicated to Danebury is one of the most interesting I've visited.

Also there are lowland camps, though few remain, which could throw up yet more information about the Iron Age. Some still exist on nature reserves, in local terms (I live in Wiltshire) I believe there is one on Blakehill Nature Reserve near Cricklade, not too far from the source of the Thames. There is also Ringsbury Camp nearby which to all intents and purposes is a hill fort but a fairly low level one.

The survey form suggests they are looking to have a database with a lot of facts about each hillfort which would make answering statistical questions a lot easier than now.

http://www.arch.ox.ac.uk/hillforts-form.html

Hmm yes I can see he wants all the information in one place. And it's kind of crowd-sourcing, like Galaxyzoo and so on. But with galaxyzoo and its kind, the amount of info you put in is very small, it only takes you a minute. But the amount of effort they want for this is massive, even for one hillfort. I suppose they might get some uptake from local archaeology societies. But it leaves a slightly odd taste, I think because it's Oxford University and if anyone's got money for research, it's them. But presumeably they're hoping if someone will do all the donkey work for nothing...

Perhaps I sound uncharitable. I mean people put a lot of time and energy into this website, and that's for no other purpose than some vague greater good and the enjoyment of visiting places and sharing that experience. But the oxford project is much more hardcore, they don't make it sound terribly enjoyable and it does smack of saving money somehow.

bawn79 wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-23203500

Professor Lock was on Irish radio this morning about this. Don't want to sound negative but in Ireland the majority of this information is available on www.archaeology.ie or have been field-walked. Not really sure what he is hoping to achieve with this? Surely the majority of hill-forts have already been recorded?

And there are other people doing their own recording as well such as Digital Digging, which has made a good start..

http://www.digitaldigging.net/hillforts/index.html

It's not a bad idea really, is it? I take the point of free research, but this type of collective, participatory archaeology could plug some gaps in the knowledge record. I've no particular objection to contributing - it's not eugenics or anything, is it?