Amberlady wrote:
tiompan wrote:
[quote="Branwen"][quote="Littlestone"] It's a epochal problem , druids are historical and the stone circles are prehistoric which doesn't mean to say there was never a onnection but impossible to prove either way .
Maybe not but the 2,500 year gap between the erection of stone circles and the appearance of Druids is something of a hint.The boggy area between archaeology and history/folk- lore produces plenty of discussion not much of which is enlightening . In this case the two sides would need to come to some agreement about the terminology i.e. what is a druid ? the pros would say that surely the description would fit the "architects " the cons "should we expect continuity " ,as you hint at .
Either way nothing conclusive is likely to come of it .