Tribute stones and petrified ancestors

close
more_vert
nigelswift N
nigelswift Oct 9, 2009 20:29:31
Replying to mountainman

"Can I respectfully suggest you do a bit of homework on this?"

Ummmmm....
What, till I come up with the right answer?
;)

The reason I suggested the two geologists subscribed to the third way was because you said they had in your blog that you directed us to, which said -


"Interestingly, Rob and Richard have not plumped for the glacial theory in preference to the human transport theory, but have suggested a third option, namely that the stones were carried to the Stonehenge area "by different groups of people."

Natch, I thought you'd done YOUR homework!

M mountainman
mountainman Oct 9, 2009 21:53:41
Replying to nigelswift

nigelswift wrote:
"Can I respectfully suggest you do a bit of homework on this?"

Ummmmm....
What, till I come up with the right answer?
;)

The reason I suggested the two geologists subscribed to the third way was because you said they had in your blog that you directed us to, which said -


"Interestingly, Rob and Richard have not plumped for the glacial theory in preference to the human transport theory, but have suggested a third option, namely that the stones were carried to the Stonehenge area "by different groups of people."


Natch, I thought you'd done YOUR homework!

I was fooled! The article had no attribution, and the guys I thought were the authors wrote to me to say they didn't write it at all -- but that it was by Mike Pitts. Sorry about that -- we were all fooled, I guess...... I have apologised to them for that misunderstanding, and added a correction on the blog as well.