tigh

close
more_vert

moss wrote:
Thanks for putting the photographs up, it look bleak but beautiful. The stones look somewhat like what you find on the Dartmoor tors. Natural shapes that are vaguely human, the trilogy of the three females has been somewhat lost in the 'family' though. If myth there be, its later, but on a cautious note bleak landscapes go quite well with prehistoric history, needs someone to dive into that cold looking loch though and find evidence....
The height is the same as the highest Dartmoor tors i.e. about 500 m but being further north it is much colder . There has been next to nothing found in the area the soil is very poor and there are no shielings which are good indicators of at least useful summer grazing and are often found much higher .No rock art either despite quite a good search .Like much of upland Scotland despite some deserted glens there would have been some areas that were only ever passed through and never settled .

My understanding was that most of the highland area of Scotland was very habitable in the first few thousand years after the last Glacial period - I just happened to be born into the cold wet period in Helensburgh's history! :-)

Not suggesting any of these features go back that far of course, but there would probably have been the right resources and climate for quite high levels of population at one time or other, all be it in a very different setting - I've seen sourcing quoting wide forestation of Rannoch Moor with pine and alder round about 6,000/7,000 BP?

Mac