Do you know how they work?

close
more_vert
Snap S
Snap Aug 20, 2007 14:02:10
Replying to Snap

The seven power bands on every stone appear to work at different frequencys for different lengths/levels of comunication. Most /all stone circles have water lines under them most are in dirct line with the above stone and are dowsable those where stones are missing have water lines with spirals which would form the origanal pattern of stones hence why lots of churches have the same lines( because they desroyed old sites to build there own power bases
Snap

J Jane
Jane Aug 20, 2007 14:24:01
Replying to Snap

Snap wrote:
The seven power bands on every stone appear to work at different frequencys for different lengths/levels of comunication.
Have you measured that? Can it be repeated and corroborated by others who can reach the seame conclusions?

Snap wrote:
Most /all stone circles have water lines
What's a water line? Is it something to do with the water table?

.

Snap wrote:
... are dowsable those where stones are missing have water lines with spirals which would form the origanal pattern of stones hence why lots of churches have the same lines( because they desroyed old sites to build there own power bases
Snap
Whoa there! Evidence please, scientific, measurable, repeatable, independently corroboratable, double-blind evidence please.

Please do not present things as facts which are not.

J
x

T tiompan
tiompan Aug 20, 2007 14:48:31
Replying to Snap

As I was currently going over stuff in this area , here's another "ley line" all reference points are from as near as possible to the centre of the circle .

Burreldales stone circle - South Ythsie stone circle = 139.140 degrees
Burreldales stone circle - Hill of Foddes stone circle = 139 .322 degrees

The distance between Burreldales and Hill of Fiddes is 40.00666 K the error between the two figures at that distance is about 7 metres ,less than the width of the monument .
Even better , at that latitude 57.583 , the winter sun rise = 138.57 degrees .

R Rhiannon
Rhiannon Aug 20, 2007 16:12:32
Replying to Snap

Hi Snap. I've never gone and tried to dowse at any stones. I don't suppose many people have. It's easy to think it's rubbish because it doesn't fit in with generally held ideas about the material world which most people have in our culture in the 21st century. Part of me is very scientific and rational, the bit that poo-poohs it so I feel too embarrassed to to and dowse at a stone. But there's another bit of me that's very fortean and thinks people shouldn't dismiss people (like you)'s experiences so lightly. (it's not really the point, but it relates to why I am intrigued by experiences (and stories) of fairies and suchlike) because what are such experiences based on? Maybe they serve a purpose in a culture, and maybe they're based on real experiences based on the way our brains work.
I really like 'needles of stone' and reread it recently. It's easy to say 'dowsing is rubbish and doesn't work' and that may be true. But to the people doing it, they are experiencing Something are they not? (not all of them can be pretending..) And what's that Something?

Also. It's not so hard to put things in straight lines - the Romans were very good at it and they just had their low-tech 'groma's.

there's more things in heaven and earth etc.. and the best way to find out the truths of things is to experiment. Which is like wot you are doing.

I know some people will think opening your mind too far lets your brain fall out. But I know as I keep learning about science, social science, art etc my outlook on things has altered, and I think it's good to shake your brain up and see things from a new perspective sometimes.