close
more_vert

Me: As are most celestial/landscape feature alignments in my mind.


You: Much more difficult to prove intentionality than above .


Me again: That's why I added the "in my mind" to the end of the sentence :-)


Actually, if there's a statistical trend towards certain things then it becomes easier to support a theory. It does not become easier to prove it, though.

I don't do the maths on this stuff any more. I used to work in statistics, but I hate the stuff these days - my software company specialised in statistical analysis, until I closed it down.

FourWinds wrote:
Me: As are most celestial/landscape feature alignments in my mind.


You: Much more difficult to prove intentionality than above .


Me again: That's why I added the "in my mind" to the end of the sentence :-)


Actually, if there's a statistical trend towards certain things then it becomes easier to support a theory. It does not become easier to prove it, though.

I don't do the maths on this stuff any more. I used to work in statistics, but I hate the stuff these days - my software company specialised in statistical analysis, until I closed it down.

Sadly it is what is needed to see if the figures are just noisy bullshit . Just glad I don't have to bother with learning the stuff . Did you use Bayseian stats .?