close
more_vert

FourWinds wrote:
Show me some that lie on Great Circles (the shortest distance between sites on the curvature of the Earth's surface) and I'll start to look at them.

That was the case with the Tables des Marchands figures .

I like inter-site sight lines.
Basis of archaeoastronomy . Very, very important. As are most celestial/landscape feature alignments in my mind.
Much more difficult to prove intentionality than above .

I just can't begin to consider the energy line stuff at the moment.
I doubt I ever will .

Me: As are most celestial/landscape feature alignments in my mind.


You: Much more difficult to prove intentionality than above .


Me again: That's why I added the "in my mind" to the end of the sentence :-)


Actually, if there's a statistical trend towards certain things then it becomes easier to support a theory. It does not become easier to prove it, though.

I don't do the maths on this stuff any more. I used to work in statistics, but I hate the stuff these days - my software company specialised in statistical analysis, until I closed it down.