close
more_vert

cymap wrote:
Those figures no matter how they are reasoned upon are flawed simply because there are no records. Its simple really.
Well, all you have to do then is provide the records which show these figures are "wrong". Its simple really. But until you do, the HA figures stand unchallenged - but challenging the pro-collecting lobby to make a case. Go ahead, do it; don't moan about "feeling insulted", get on with making a case. But do it somewhere else please.

[quote="Paul Barford get on with making a case. But do it somewhere else please.[/quote]

Topic aside for a min,
what gives you the right to suggest this?
Control freak springs to mind..................

Mr Barford, I can moan about anything I like, this is a public forum and I have as much right to be here as you . To say the figures are unchallenged is folly. You your self have put doubt on the figures saying what you have about trying to pull them apart and mentioning "IF" they were half or a quarter. If those figures were FACT then you wouldnt have to guess would you. The only figures that are not folly on this thread are the government figures for reported finds. Bye

HI there -

Paul Barford wrote:
[quote="cymap"]
Well, all you have to do then is provide the records which show these figures are "wrong". Its simple really. But until you do, the HA figures stand unchallenged - but challenging the pro-collecting lobby to make a case. Go ahead, do it; don't moan about "feeling insulted", get on with making a case. But do it somewhere else please.
Errm...forgive me for interjecting here - but considering that you've contributed bugger-all tangible to this website, if you are gonna speak here, get rid of that arrogant attitude, or simply go elsewhere. Full stop!