close
more_vert

Rhiannon wrote:
Also I'm not quite sure why a person would want to remain anonymous if they stand by their views, unless they're the type of views that are going to get them into trouble. (I don't necessarily think that 'Hob' and 'Chris Collyer' would have wanted their real names kept out of the paper - maybe they weren't asked or contacted).
Cursuswalker is my Pagan name. It started life as an anonymous e-mail address name in the days (not so long ago) when it was still legal to discriminate against employees (teachers in my case) on the basis of their religion.

It is now an actual alternative name for me. In fact many people use the name Cursus for me even though they know my Birth name (NOT Real name).

I would therefore be quite offended to see it put in quote marks.

Ah but they don't know that, because they haven't contacted you. I think it's part of the casualness of using the quote, because they're taking it from a casual remark on a website. Because let's face it websites are pretty new in the scheme of things and they just do not have the same authority as quoting the Journal of Applied Modern Antiquarianism, do they? Perhaps the fact that some people ARE starting to quote TMA suggests that it's gaining some credibility, indeed. But it's early days innit. I mean trying to do the bibliography for this essay I wrote recently, it's a total nightmare trying to find out how to reference pictures, videos, etc on the net, it's very complicated and hard to find a standard way of doing things.
I'm sure if they knew your name was Actually Cursuswalker, as you say it is, then they'd not have included the quote marks. But being used to names like Bob Smith, they'd have (not unreasonably) assumed it was a pseudonym. Surely.

come on surely someone wants to be on my side :)