coping strategies

close
more_vert

When I visit sites on Dartmoor I never wonder what their purpose is or was , as we will never know the reason, the same with all megalithic sites. We can only speculate. Take Stonehenge as an example, for years everyone has been saying it was there for a midsummer ceremony, now it is thought to be for midwinter.
I first started to visit sites on Dartmoor in the early 1960's, after I came across them while out walking/camping as a teenager. The first one I came across was Hingston Hill / Down Tor stone row I had no idea what ,or how old it was, it was but it fascinated me. What did strike me , and the same with other sites I have visited since, is the setting it was in. This is why I visit sites now, not just for the stones, but for the whole atmosphere of the place that I can just sit and enjoy.

Peace, Lubin

>> Take Stonehenge as an example, for years everyone has been saying it was there for a >> midsummer ceremony, now it is thought to be for midwinter.

I'm not picking you up on this point BTW ...

Why couldn't it have been for both? Seems sensible enough for me. Why do people have to polarise things? I think those that are saying it was midwinter and <i>not</i> midsummer are being contrary for the hell of it. The Heel Stone and its lost partner (to me) prove the midsummer alignment. The midwinter only theory just fits in with the Durrington wood for the living & Stonehenge stone for the dead theory.