>Why can't we have a single site named museum?
>within that site you could list every museum, which would then be a link to that facility?
>or is that too simple?

It's not too simple, but it'd bugger everything up. I can't think for one minute how that would do anything other than break the structure of the site completely. It'd be as useful as having a site named 'Stone' and doing the same thing :) - totally at odds with how the site works (or doesn't work, depending on your view).

We'll add facilities to the TMA search in due course, that's a great idea, thanks RN.

TMA Ed.