I did indeed contribute to writing the submission Peter, and there's nothing wrong with it. Except. It has become apparent that it is not getting the unequivocal wide support that I hope for it and it is therefore weakened.

That is why i said on the other thread - "Achievable Stonehenge must be iterated and submitted to lots of other high places where mention of the A303 isn't mandatory. If it is, in that form, it will be supported universally by the megalithic public."

So I agree with you. Part 1 CAN be extracted and sent elsewhere and does have a chance of support. That's what VBB is essentially proposing and what this thread is about.