Indeed. That restoration appears to have been done very sensitively (and quickly!).

My objection is more about re-erecting stones that have fallen some time ago, maybe even in ancient times, than ones which fall over "these days" like your excellently restored example.

i am definately a restoration man - although it is unpleasant when you can see the concrete - like the stone on bernera which the Curtises re-erected. but that was in the seventies (i think) and I suspect they are a bit embarassed by it now. also, it's forgiveable because they have done so much extraordinarily sensitive restoration work on sites which nobody else gave a fuck about.