Over this summer, I have visited and photographed over 100 sites - many of which are not listed here as sites (I will add them when my dial up gets broadbandified, later this year).
At some sites, I've been dismayed to see fallen stones re-erected and concreted into place, sometimes even having been moved to different locations first. To me, this always feels like a modern setting, and gives a site all the atmosphere of a municipal swing-park. I'd far rather fallen stones were maintained where they lay.
Is this a peculiar point of view?