Callanish

close
more_vert

Blue Gloves, I found all that really interesting.

"The most beautiful spot is where you are now'"... is deep wisdom, although I reckon there are exceptions - if someone offered me a helicopter ride out of bloody Stourport to Callanish right now I take it!

The alignments at Smithills - how accurately have you been able to work them out so far? If they're "very" accurate they can't be dismissed by the establishment as possibly coincidental simply because downright uniquely, as you say, there are so many of them. That really would mean it's a highly important site and I hope you force them to look at it on a strictly "probability" basis. Archaeologists aren't big on that sort of thinking of course and everything's a "maybe" even the definites. A (career) survival instinct no doubt.

On the same sort of subject, what's your opinion about Thornborough's bent stick? I happened to look up at Orion the other night and the real belt is tons straighter - wouldn't they have made a better representation of it? or was it more bent in those days?

Bent stick first: I don't know. But I've seen the figure appear several times in megaliths. There is a standing stone on Machrie Moor eg that is bent in the same way. I explain it as the early days of British geometry - there was deep superstition connected with what was actually scientific research. I think that power was invoked by alignment and that if you could incorporate two alignments in the same structure, by a kink, then you could accumulate more magical power.

I've measured the Smithills stone rows to an accuracy of about plus or minus two and a half degrees. An engineer would laugh at that accuracy - or lack of it - but there are unknowns, in the field, that can alter the results by this amount no matter how accurately the azimuths are defined. This is atmospheric refraction, which varies according to barometric pressure, atmospheric pollution and something else I've forgotten. It's like trying to measure a loaf of bread with a ruler - the only true test is to taste it. With the Smithills stone rows this means watching for the moon at the dates they were built to record.

I'd like to see photographs of sun and moon sets from these newly found monuments. As well as the lunar points one of them gives a good indication of the sunset on the shortest day - this one's on Winter Hill ! - and the Thurstones give a good indication of the sunrise on both May Day and Lammas Day. I hope to capture the mayday sunrise this year - bet it rains ! These four lunar observatories also help explain why some Boltonians are quite weird.

Talking of alignments, does anyone know of any software that can show the night sky in prehistoric times? I have HNSky, but it only goes back as far as 1751. Freeware or shareware solutions would be preferable since this is only a fairly casual interest.