Callanish

close
more_vert

There's at least two sides to Bolton - there's Peter Kay and Fred's side - mills, back to backs and grotty nightclubs, and then there's the Bolton of Stu Francis and Badly Drawn Boy, bluebells and the open moors. But have a look at this page - http://www.iol.ie/~geniet/eng/majorstandstills.htm - and test the links that you see to the sites investigating the next lunar 'standstill'. The Bolton one certainly works.

In the Smithills Country Park there are four stone rows, two are crooked like a broken stick, so there are six possible alignments. (There's far more certainty with a straight line than with a circle). The moon has four extreme positions - the most northerly rising position, the most southerly rising position, the most northerly setting position and the most southern setting position. I've found the best way to understand this movement is as the tides. There is an eighteen and a half year cycle.

The Bolton stone rows are lined up on these four points in the sky - that isn't so much unusual as downright unique. The two alignments left over are to Spica rising, at about 2000 BCE, and to Deneb setting, at about the same date. No, the scenery isn't as spectacular as on the Isle of Lewis - the monuments are much less romantic - even pragmatic. But they are there.

When the quarter moon rises at the standstill in 2006 it will be from behind the ridge in this picture - http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/21430 (there's none of that skipping around the horizon stuff here). The moonset, to this particular standstill, is very beautiful though. It'll be reflected in Liverpool Bay and will disappear behind - well I'm not sure (ask me after 2006) - possibly the stack at Holyhead. I need a ten mile to the inch map to work it out.

And the moral of this story is 'the most beautiful spot is where you are now'.

Blue Gloves, I found all that really interesting.

"The most beautiful spot is where you are now'"... is deep wisdom, although I reckon there are exceptions - if someone offered me a helicopter ride out of bloody Stourport to Callanish right now I take it!

The alignments at Smithills - how accurately have you been able to work them out so far? If they're "very" accurate they can't be dismissed by the establishment as possibly coincidental simply because downright uniquely, as you say, there are so many of them. That really would mean it's a highly important site and I hope you force them to look at it on a strictly "probability" basis. Archaeologists aren't big on that sort of thinking of course and everything's a "maybe" even the definites. A (career) survival instinct no doubt.

On the same sort of subject, what's your opinion about Thornborough's bent stick? I happened to look up at Orion the other night and the real belt is tons straighter - wouldn't they have made a better representation of it? or was it more bent in those days?