Ritual Landscapes

close
more_vert
Hob H
Hob Oct 11, 2005 11:35:43
Replying to Moth

Could always bung it up as a weblog with links to examples of the sites mentioned in the text?

I know it's not strictly speaking what the blog facility is meant to be for, but I've not got any stick for it* with my one attempt at a tma-blog. I think it makes for a better space to put theorising etc than the forum, and of course a blog can still be discussed on the forum if people want to nit-pick and/or argue about the content.

*so far, but probably will now I've drawn attention to it...

M Moth
Moth Oct 11, 2005 13:17:39
Replying to Hob

That'd work too. Surely it's a perfect use of a blog - Fitz has done vaguely similar things too - & surely fits the guidelines?

love

Moth

B BuckyE
BuckyE Oct 11, 2005 16:38:09
Replying to Hob

My thoughts so far are vague and general, refer to the whole spectrum of prehistoric "art" and stones from Orkney to Urfa, 30,000 BCE to 1,500 and don't focus on any particular kinds of monuments. If I'm going to stick my neck out, may I do it as a forum post, to which you folks can reply immediately and vociferously? Would that be acceptable? This would be WAY off --although perhaps not antithetical to-- the Mother Earth Goddess theme of Mr. Cope's book.

As a very newcomer to this site, I don't want to intrude with unwelcome themes. Nigel and Jimit can appreciate that considering the "young earth" hooraw currently clogging up the Stone Pages, I'm sure. And also vouch for the fact that I'm not completely whacko. I hope.