Personally, I'm willing to help reduce (to zero is possible) the number of physical at 'sites of historical sensitivity'. Although I don't like the idea at all any reduction (especially at such locations) is a good thing. It would be petty and hypocritical to say I won't help to do this and keep on complaining.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by FourWinds
24th January 2003ce
08:43 |
GeoCaching (NightCacherPid, Jan 22, 2003, 00:35)- Re: GeoCaching (NightCacherDan, Jan 22, 2003, 01:28)
- Re: GeoCaching (FourWinds, Jan 22, 2003, 06:47)
- Re: GeoCaching (lobsterboy, Jan 22, 2003, 08:42)
- Re: GeoCaching (Kaipaith, Jan 22, 2003, 10:42)
- Bloody Hell!!!! (moey, Jan 22, 2003, 12:15)
- F***!!!!! (moey, Jan 22, 2003, 12:20)
- Re: F***!!!!! (FourWinds, Jan 22, 2003, 12:22)
- Re: F***!!!!! (Kaipaith, Jan 22, 2003, 12:27)
- Re: F***!!!!! (lobsterboy, Jan 22, 2003, 12:41)
- Re: F***!!!!! (pebblesfromheaven, Jan 22, 2003, 23:01)
- Doggone (Chrism, Jan 23, 2003, 08:42)
- And while I'm at it ... (FourWinds, Jan 22, 2003, 06:55)
- Re: GeoCaching (Holy McGrail, Jan 22, 2003, 07:45)
- Re: GeoCaching (Pagan Dawn, Jan 22, 2003, 11:50)
- WTF!?! (IronMan, Jan 22, 2003, 13:20)
- Re: GeoCaching (Kammer, Jan 22, 2003, 16:08)
- Re: GeoCaching (Pharisee, Jan 22, 2003, 16:42)
- Re: GeoCaching (nigelswift, Jan 22, 2003, 16:55)
- Re: GeoCaching (FourWinds, Jan 22, 2003, 17:02)
- Re: GeoCaching (Kammer, Jan 22, 2003, 17:13)
- Re: GeoCaching (Tufty, Jan 22, 2003, 21:25)
- Re: GeoCaching (Tree-Hugger, Jan 23, 2003, 09:16)
- Re: GeoCaching (moggymiaow, Jan 23, 2003, 21:52)
- A solution! (Pete G, Jan 22, 2003, 17:16)
- Re: GeoCaching (grufty jim, Jan 22, 2003, 20:24)
- Re: GeoCaching (Tufty, Jan 22, 2003, 22:36)
- Re: GeoCaching (Cache Man, Jan 23, 2003, 01:45)
- Peoples Front of Caching (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 09:28)
- Re: GeoCaching (Tree-Hugger, Jan 23, 2003, 10:32)
- Re: GeoCaching (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 10:35)
- Re: GeoCaching (Reluctant Defender, Jan 23, 2003, 11:11)
- coughs nervously ... (FourWinds, Jan 23, 2003, 11:33)
- Re: GeoCaching (Cache Man, Jan 23, 2003, 12:46)
- Navicache (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 12:53)
- Re: GeoCaching (Kaipaith, Jan 23, 2003, 12:54)
- Re: GeoCaching (FourWinds, Jan 23, 2003, 12:57)
- be our guest (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 13:02)
- Re: be our guest (Kaipaith, Jan 23, 2003, 13:24)
- Re: be our guest (Kaipaith, Jan 23, 2003, 13:28)
- but on the other hand (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 14:19)
- Re: be our guest (Cache Man, Jan 24, 2003, 22:02)
- Re: be our guest (Morseman, Jan 26, 2003, 22:07)
- Re: GeoCaching (Scout, Jan 24, 2003, 00:43)
- Re: GeoCaching (Cache Man, Jan 24, 2003, 21:51)
- Not the time, nor the place, but (Reluctant Defender, Jan 23, 2003, 15:22)
- Re: Not the time, nor the place, but .. (FourWinds, Jan 23, 2003, 15:28)
- that's a bit harsh (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 15:30)
- Re: Not the time, nor the place, but (Squid Tempest, Jan 23, 2003, 15:30)
- Re: Not the time, nor the place, but (Cache Man, Jan 24, 2003, 22:18)
- Clarification (Morseman, Jan 23, 2003, 11:10)
- What will they do? (FourWinds, Feb 02, 2003, 15:08)
- Co-operation? (Teasel, Jan 23, 2003, 15:18)
- Re: Co-operation? (Squid Tempest, Jan 23, 2003, 15:33)
- Re: Co-operation? (moggymiaow, Jan 23, 2003, 21:49)
- Re: Co-operation? (FourWinds, Jan 24, 2003, 08:43)
- Re: Co-operation? (Morseman, Jan 24, 2003, 14:14)
- here's two .... (FourWinds, Jan 23, 2003, 21:57)
- Kaipath's weblog post & the Cachers. (Holy McGrail, Jan 23, 2003, 23:36)
|
|
Head To Head 
Co-operation? (Teasel)