...yeah, but the following is in their rules:
(Added 5/28/02) Please do not place caches on archaeological or historical sites. In most cases these areas are highly sensitive to the extra traffic that would be caused by vehicles and humans. If you find a cache in one of these areas please remove it and replace it a safe enough distance from the site to ensure that the site will not be impacted by people searching for the cache and unknowingly traveling over or through a site.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by elderford
22nd January 2003ce
16:06 |
GeoCaching (NightCacherPid, Jan 22, 2003, 00:35)- Re: GeoCaching (NightCacherDan, Jan 22, 2003, 01:28)
- Re: GeoCaching (FourWinds, Jan 22, 2003, 06:47)
- Re: GeoCaching (lobsterboy, Jan 22, 2003, 08:42)
- Re: GeoCaching (Kaipaith, Jan 22, 2003, 10:42)
- Bloody Hell!!!! (moey, Jan 22, 2003, 12:15)
- F***!!!!! (moey, Jan 22, 2003, 12:20)
- Re: F***!!!!! (FourWinds, Jan 22, 2003, 12:22)
- Re: F***!!!!! (Kaipaith, Jan 22, 2003, 12:27)
- Re: F***!!!!! (lobsterboy, Jan 22, 2003, 12:41)
- Re: F***!!!!! (pebblesfromheaven, Jan 22, 2003, 23:01)
- Doggone (Chrism, Jan 23, 2003, 08:42)
- And while I'm at it ... (FourWinds, Jan 22, 2003, 06:55)
- Re: GeoCaching (Holy McGrail, Jan 22, 2003, 07:45)
- Re: GeoCaching (Pagan Dawn, Jan 22, 2003, 11:50)
- WTF!?! (IronMan, Jan 22, 2003, 13:20)
- Re: GeoCaching (Kammer, Jan 22, 2003, 16:08)
- Re: GeoCaching (Pharisee, Jan 22, 2003, 16:42)
- Re: GeoCaching (nigelswift, Jan 22, 2003, 16:55)
- Re: GeoCaching (FourWinds, Jan 22, 2003, 17:02)
- Re: GeoCaching (Kammer, Jan 22, 2003, 17:13)
- Re: GeoCaching (Tufty, Jan 22, 2003, 21:25)
- Re: GeoCaching (Tree-Hugger, Jan 23, 2003, 09:16)
- Re: GeoCaching (moggymiaow, Jan 23, 2003, 21:52)
- A solution! (Pete G, Jan 22, 2003, 17:16)
- Re: GeoCaching (grufty jim, Jan 22, 2003, 20:24)
- Re: GeoCaching (Tufty, Jan 22, 2003, 22:36)
- Re: GeoCaching (Cache Man, Jan 23, 2003, 01:45)
- Peoples Front of Caching (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 09:28)
- Re: GeoCaching (Tree-Hugger, Jan 23, 2003, 10:32)
- Re: GeoCaching (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 10:35)
- Re: GeoCaching (Reluctant Defender, Jan 23, 2003, 11:11)
- coughs nervously ... (FourWinds, Jan 23, 2003, 11:33)
- Re: GeoCaching (Cache Man, Jan 23, 2003, 12:46)
- Navicache (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 12:53)
- Re: GeoCaching (Kaipaith, Jan 23, 2003, 12:54)
- Re: GeoCaching (FourWinds, Jan 23, 2003, 12:57)
- be our guest (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 13:02)
- Re: be our guest (Kaipaith, Jan 23, 2003, 13:24)
- Re: be our guest (Kaipaith, Jan 23, 2003, 13:28)
- but on the other hand (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 14:19)
- Re: be our guest (Cache Man, Jan 24, 2003, 22:02)
- Re: be our guest (Morseman, Jan 26, 2003, 22:07)
- Re: GeoCaching (Scout, Jan 24, 2003, 00:43)
- Re: GeoCaching (Cache Man, Jan 24, 2003, 21:51)
- Not the time, nor the place, but (Reluctant Defender, Jan 23, 2003, 15:22)
- Re: Not the time, nor the place, but .. (FourWinds, Jan 23, 2003, 15:28)
- that's a bit harsh (RiotGibbon, Jan 23, 2003, 15:30)
- Re: Not the time, nor the place, but (Squid Tempest, Jan 23, 2003, 15:30)
- Re: Not the time, nor the place, but (Cache Man, Jan 24, 2003, 22:18)
- Clarification (Morseman, Jan 23, 2003, 11:10)
- What will they do? (FourWinds, Feb 02, 2003, 15:08)
- Co-operation? (Teasel, Jan 23, 2003, 15:18)
- Re: Co-operation? (Squid Tempest, Jan 23, 2003, 15:33)
- Re: Co-operation? (moggymiaow, Jan 23, 2003, 21:49)
- Re: Co-operation? (FourWinds, Jan 24, 2003, 08:43)
- Re: Co-operation? (Morseman, Jan 24, 2003, 14:14)
- here's two .... (FourWinds, Jan 23, 2003, 21:57)
- Kaipath's weblog post & the Cachers. (Holy McGrail, Jan 23, 2003, 23:36)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Here come the posse (juamei)