>at what distance from Avebury/Delling would people say it's OK to molest the stones then?<
point taken, but I still feel they could have done with treating this subject with a bit more respect. I think archeology and reconstruction-of-past -event type thingies should be as un-intrusive as possible. we don't know what evidence we might destroy which will be of interest to future generations. I know it's unlikely that future folks will want to study that particular stone, but it's the principle of the thing. Destructive science is not something that should be encouraged on the TV if you ask me.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Squid Tempest
6th December 2002ce
17:01 |
Avebury TV alert !!!! (konaman, Dec 05, 2002, 19:37)- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (konaman, Dec 05, 2002, 19:37)
- Unbelievable! (Pete G, Dec 05, 2002, 20:09)
- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (Grendel, Dec 05, 2002, 21:01)
- They have a forum You know? (Pete G, Dec 05, 2002, 23:42)
- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (Squid Tempest, Dec 06, 2002, 09:37)
- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (Duck Call, Dec 06, 2002, 13:34)
- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (pixie, Dec 06, 2002, 14:46)
- may I dissent? (RiotGibbon, Dec 06, 2002, 16:09)
- Death at Avebury (Pete G, Dec 06, 2002, 21:09)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: may I dissent? (RiotGibbon)