|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Avebury Forum | Start a topic | Search |
70 messages | Select a forum: |
| Mark Horton writes "Firstly the sarsen that we used was part of stone that had once been used in a building, and was discarded on the side of Gill's farmyard; it did not come from any of the sarsen fields, which are of course SSSI's, and nothing to do with the prehistoric monuments. " Bollux. I've studied the footage. there is no building in sight that it could have come from. Local historian Brian Edwards tells me he was astounded that they were obviously pulling a natural stone from the ground. SSSI I'm out to get the bastards now! PeteG (btw Alison Skinner, is my wife's maiden name :) Reply | with quote |  6th December 2002ce 01:56 In reply to: Re: constructive vs destructive (elderford) |
Messages in this topic: |
|