thesweetcheat wrote: tiompan wrote: Do you buy it ?
It doesn't have the falsifiability that the suggestion about the avenue did .
What about the other stones ?
I don't really buy it but it can't be proven or disproven as far as I can see. It's a nice bit of mythology but lacks any earlier corroboration in folklore that I've heard of.
That's it , unlike the Avebury case, which can be disproven , you can only shrug your shoulders , " maybe , maybe not ".
But even if if there was historic corroboration , it would only be a slightly earlier version of the 20 th C folklore , giving us an insight into how punters thought of the site in the middle ages or later .
Reply | with quote | Posted by tiompan 11th March 2017ce 22:06 |
Avebury stones . (tiompan, Mar 10, 2017, 17:23)- Re: Avebury stones . (tjj, Mar 10, 2017, 18:45)
- Re: Avebury stones . (thesweetcheat, Mar 11, 2017, 18:50)
- Re: Avebury stones . (tiompan, Mar 11, 2017, 20:04)
- Re: Avebury stones . (thesweetcheat, Mar 11, 2017, 21:54)
- Re: Avebury stones . (tiompan, Mar 11, 2017, 22:06)
- Re: Avebury stones . (tjj, Mar 12, 2017, 00:16)
|
|