nigelswift wrote: Please don't propose applying the Contingent Valuation method to archaeology and heritage. It's a popular popularity poll and it means more people will value Jedward over Stonehenge and all will be lost!
Not me Nigel. It's what Highways have already done (it's in the consultation documents).
If it hadn't been for the CVA, the whole scheme would have been labelled as having low (or negative) value: The options with value that would have remained would have been either cut and cover or widening of the existing surface route.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by jonmor
9th March 2017ce
16:10 |
Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Jan 15, 2017, 00:18)- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Jan 15, 2017, 09:43)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Jan 16, 2017, 10:33)
- Salisbury bypass (thesweetcheat, Jan 18, 2017, 20:39)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Jan 24, 2017, 10:37)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Feb 05, 2017, 10:59)
- Re: Another viewpoint from George Nash (tjj, Feb 08, 2017, 09:46)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Feb 09, 2017, 15:08)
- Re: Julian Richards gives his view on the tunnel (tjj, Feb 18, 2017, 15:02)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Feb 24, 2017, 18:40)
- Re: Friends of the Earth Petition (tjj, Feb 26, 2017, 08:59)
- Re: Dan Hicks - The Apollo Magazine (moss, Feb 27, 2017, 11:20)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Mar 01, 2017, 12:59)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Mar 06, 2017, 08:49)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Mar 16, 2017, 18:31)
- Re: Inside Out West (tjj, Mar 31, 2017, 20:12)
- Re: UNESCO say tunnel should be reconsidered (tjj, Jun 15, 2017, 22:29)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (nigelswift)