tjj wrote: For once Moss, I'm afraid I have to disagree with you. It compounded all the reservations expressed earlier in this thread and it was dishonest in its 'harmlessness'. The 'find' was so obviously a replica of the very precious Alfred Jewel which was found in 1693 - implying there may be another one out there buried by an ancient site was at the very least disingenuous.
I think you're entirely correct June. How could you not be?
https://heritageaction.wordpre[...]05/bbc-comedy-ends-in-tragedy/
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
5th December 2015ce
07:33 |
Detectorists 2 (spencer, Oct 15, 2015, 21:02)- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 15, 2015, 23:13)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 27, 2015, 08:32)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 29, 2015, 07:55)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Oct 30, 2015, 05:58)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (tjj, Oct 30, 2015, 10:29)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 11:06)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Oct 30, 2015, 12:05)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Howburn Digger, Oct 30, 2015, 14:46)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (tjj, Oct 30, 2015, 14:51)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 15:21)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Feb 04, 2016, 08:57)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 16:53)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (sleeptowin, Nov 02, 2015, 16:36)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Nov 14, 2015, 12:43)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (moss, Dec 04, 2015, 09:00)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (tjj, Dec 04, 2015, 09:12)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Dec 04, 2015, 14:05)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Dec 05, 2015, 07:33)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Dec 04, 2015, 09:36)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (spencer, Dec 04, 2015, 11:22)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (scubi63, Dec 23, 2015, 22:03)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Detectorists 2 (tjj)