You're perfectly right, it's only a TV programme, and a superb one at that, but having spent nearly 2 decades trying to do something about the massive, unnecessary loss of knowledge I guess I'm entitled to fret about certain aspects of it that I'm pretty sure will accelerate the loss.
(As for accusations I'm not fairminded, it was I not my critics who proposed and organised the Institute of Responsible Detectorists and various other pro-detecting initiatives, so you can draw your own conclusions on the matter!)
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
2nd November 2015ce
18:20 |
Detectorists 2 (spencer, Oct 15, 2015, 21:02)- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 15, 2015, 23:13)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 27, 2015, 08:32)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 29, 2015, 07:55)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Oct 30, 2015, 05:58)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (tjj, Oct 30, 2015, 10:29)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 11:06)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Oct 30, 2015, 12:05)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Howburn Digger, Oct 30, 2015, 14:46)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (tjj, Oct 30, 2015, 14:51)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 15:21)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Feb 04, 2016, 08:57)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 16:53)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (sleeptowin, Nov 02, 2015, 16:36)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Nov 02, 2015, 17:25)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Nov 02, 2015, 18:20)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Nov 14, 2015, 12:43)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (moss, Dec 04, 2015, 09:00)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (scubi63, Dec 23, 2015, 22:03)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Detectorists 2 (sleeptowin)