Mount meru is refered to as early as 7th c in sanskrit texts as an earth chakra, yet today there is no archeological evidence (there will remain none in the future !) ZERO,. of it being so whatsoever !, so does this devalue its credibility as crown chakra of the earth ? , does it even suggest that it was not considered as such before the 7th c ad ?. bear in mind this historical evidence which could so easily have been lost completely to history (as so much has. IMO it was surely considered as such in africa and to eastern mystics amongst others long, long before this time and this knowledge had been passed on, this type of sacred knowing you see is always firstly held in the heart.
There is no 'archeological evidence' at all , or any 'real proof' of my group and I holding a deep vigil at glastonbury annually the past nineteen summers. -Every person thinks the limits of their understanding to be the limits for the world -.