VBB wrote: and furthermore as we all know, behaving in a fashion that encourages the impression that public enthusiasts are a rabble of egotistical loose cannons that converse as if holding a tired closing time pub conversation.
Hmmm. Rather wet. Anybody (archaeologist, heritage doodah, whatever) who is so woefully ignorant that they fail to understand how ALL public forums, at one time or another, descend into 'childish' argument is not worth listening to in the first place, as they must have been living under a rock for the last 20 years.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Evergreen Dazed
5th December 2012ce
10:12 |
|
Head To Head 
Re: New study challenges timeline (VBB)