|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Stonehenge Forum | Start a topic | Search |
213 messages | Select a forum: |
Evergreen Dazed wrote: tiompan wrote: Evergreen Dazed wrote: [quote="nigelswift"] I personally wouldn't want to see 'The Sensible Forum' and 'The Way-out' Forum'. It doesn't feel right to me. This subject is about us, all of us, and where we come from! Personally I think it is about "them " , and what you or I think is not really that important . Yes, I see what you mean, but we 'are' them, if you get my drift. looking at the start of this thread and the way that it has shifted i.e. originally about the problems sorting out the sequence of events at a monument =them , to the later comments , mostly us and regularly " I " , exemplifies the difference for me . No coincidence that the dodgy stuff tends to be very "I" based too, not really about the people of the past but more often how someone usually an "I " has an ability to garner info that is otherwise unavailable to everyone else . There is never any evidence to support the ability or the info , what is important is the "I" and their "abilities " .This is also coupled with a disdain for those who actually do garner the genuine info often relatively anonymously . Reply | with quote |  4th December 2012ce 09:42 In reply to: Re: New study challenges timeline (Evergreen Dazed)3 replies: Re: New study challenges timeline (nigelswift) Re: New study challenges timeline (Evergreen Dazed) Re: New study challenges timeline (Littlestone) |
Messages in this topic: |
|