I think on a national level the Tories can most certainly be blamed for an ideology that gladly and deliberately promotes a principle of a twisted brute priviledge survival ethos of the economic fittest at the expense of the vulnerable and un-priviledged. It's a matter of degrees, and not comparison, in my opinion. Morally abhorrent and utterly disgraceful.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by The Sea Cat
14th November 2010ce
12:08 |
Living Heritage Threat (The Sea Cat, Oct 25, 2010, 07:36)- Re: Living Heritage Threat (tjj, Oct 25, 2010, 06:49)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (Sanctuary, Oct 25, 2010, 07:16)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (tjj, Oct 25, 2010, 21:29)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (Kozmik_Ken, Oct 25, 2010, 22:41)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (drewbhoy, Oct 26, 2010, 00:40)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (moss, Oct 26, 2010, 05:43)
- Says it all (nigelswift, Oct 26, 2010, 11:30)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (Kid Calamity, Oct 26, 2010, 12:44)
- Re: Statement from the Woodland Trust (tjj, Oct 27, 2010, 12:18)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (tjj, Oct 29, 2010, 09:25)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (megadread, Nov 10, 2010, 18:02)
- Elephants & tigers & hens & other Tory targets (nigelswift, Nov 14, 2010, 06:16)
- Re: Roaches up for sale (tjj, Nov 29, 2010, 19:17)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (tjj, Dec 03, 2010, 10:00)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (The Sea Cat, Dec 20, 2010, 11:00)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (The Sea Cat, Jan 21, 2011, 13:27)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (Sanctuary, Feb 02, 2011, 13:09)
- Re: Living Heritage Threat (The Sea Cat, May 01, 2011, 08:25)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Elephants & tigers & hens & other Tory targets (GLADMAN)