moss wrote: Hi Megadread,
Just a couple of points...
1) That the business between Pete Glastonbury and Eternal Idol is private business that can be settled by solicitors if they wish to take it that far, and not really a discussion point on a public forum maybe?
2) That HA has no influence on TMA whatsoever, we, like everyone else do not know who the moderators are, and are happy for it to be that way. So whoever the supposed informer is they seem to have got it wrong ;).
Moss
Hi Moss.
On point one, point taken, just wound me up that the guy seemingly accused me of stirring things when i don't even go to his site.
i'll drop it now.
On point 2, maybe it's just someone trying to wind me up, it's quite easily done, though god only knows why they'd want to.
Maybe i shouldn't have my e-mail in my profile.
They're getting ignored from now on anyway.
Reply | with quote | Posted by megadread 28th October 2010ce 10:07 |
EH image copyright (Hob, Oct 21, 2010, 21:40)- Re: EH image copyright (Hob, Oct 21, 2010, 22:33)
- So are EH claiming the image rights to this? (nigelswift, Oct 22, 2010, 10:48)
- Re: EH image copyright (Jane, Oct 22, 2010, 13:39)
- Re: EH image copyright (Rhiannon, Oct 23, 2010, 06:10)
- Re: EH image copyright (goffik, Oct 23, 2010, 16:27)
- Re: EH image copyright (Rhiannon, Oct 23, 2010, 16:51)
- Re: EH image copyright (megadread, Oct 24, 2010, 01:18)
- Re: EH image copyright (nigelswift, Oct 24, 2010, 02:24)
- Re: EH image copyright (megadread, Oct 24, 2010, 02:26)
- Re: EH image copyright (megadread, Oct 24, 2010, 02:30)
- Re: OT EI (megadread, Oct 25, 2010, 23:04)
- Re: OT EI (megadread, Oct 28, 2010, 00:06)
- Re: OT EI (Sanctuary, Oct 28, 2010, 06:07)
- Re: OT EI (moss, Oct 28, 2010, 06:27)
- Re: OT EI (nigelswift, Oct 28, 2010, 07:02)
- Re: OT EI (megadread, Oct 28, 2010, 10:07)
- Re: EH image copyright (The Eternal, Oct 23, 2010, 23:50)
|
|