Mr Hamhead wrote:
I am no scholar of ancient text but to say that a shape seen on one of the stones is slighty similar to the Sumarian 60 is pretty thin evidence is it not. We are not exactly talking complex rock art here are we?
I gave them the benefit of the doubt there , seeing it as a description rather than really them believing it was "a" Sumerian 60 .It's quite a simple shape and a simpler description might have been better .
 Reply | with quote | Posted by tiompan
21st April 2011ce
07:54 |
Trevethy Quoit (wychburyman, Jul 28, 2010, 14:19)- Re: Trethevy Quoit (Moth, Jul 28, 2010, 16:36)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (Megalithics, Jul 28, 2010, 17:42)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (fauny fergus, Jul 28, 2010, 19:57)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (Mr Hamhead, Jul 29, 2010, 09:10)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (stonefree, Apr 18, 2011, 10:59)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (tiompan, Apr 18, 2011, 12:05)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (StoneGloves, Apr 19, 2011, 11:32)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (Mr Hamhead, Apr 20, 2011, 22:23)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2011, 23:04)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (tiompan, Apr 21, 2011, 07:31)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (tiompan, Apr 21, 2011, 07:54)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (Littlestone, Apr 21, 2011, 08:02)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (Horsedrawn, Apr 21, 2011, 09:12)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (Horsedrawn, Apr 21, 2011, 19:21)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (stonefree, Apr 18, 2011, 22:44)
- Re: Trevethy Quoit (Horsedrawn, Apr 18, 2011, 23:11)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Trevethy Quoit (Mr Hamhead)