|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Silbury Hill Forum | Start a topic | Search |
194 messages | Select a forum: |
Mustard wrote: Resonox wrote: BTW..I know what's going to happen here...a sneaky little post moaning about being bullied, misrepresented, misconstrued and only "quoting" a bit of the whole post(the relevant bit IMO) not being "fair".... fire away, I've made my point and won't labour the point in hand further. You do realise that constantly trying to stop people having a discussion(or even a differing point of view) by consistently making claims of being bullied is looked upon as a form of bullying in it's own right on several sites and frowned on by moderators as it is deemed a calculated attempt to stop someone posting for fear of having unwarranted accusations thrown at them EVERY time they disagree with said accuser!!! What an absurd accusation. It's interesting to see that the bullying behaviour on this forum now extends to accusing the bullied of being bullies if they mention the fact that they're being bullied. That's a fairly impressive bit of logical contortion. Furthermore, I assume you failed to notice the multiple posts where I encouraged Nigel to engage constructively and politely? I also assume that you failed to noticed the multiple occasions where I attempted to engage Nigel in conversation, and he responded with dismissive one line quips and sarcastic comments? tjj wrote: Resonox, OK I've come back via 'humiliation alley' having decided to give it a rest last week when the 'drip drip' effect from you and A.N.Other finally got to me and actually made me feel unwell. Can I take it from the above statement that it is now ok for me to join in future discussions without getting accused of disrupting the forum or having my posts over-analysed for ill intent. I do hope so. Best wishes to all ... can we move on now.tjj So tjj has once again stated for all to see that in some way I am personally responsible for her "being ill" because I disagreed with her and was using alter-ego usernames...and again Mustard tries to subvert my meaning by claiming that I am in fact the bully who is trying to get a full blown argument with all and sundry by blaming them for doing the very things he does(and doing exactly what tjj claims is done to her which results in her needing time-out to recuperate)....but doing it in the usual.."I'm telling Miss on you" manner. I have requested that the moderators reassure tjj that I have 1 username ONLY...whether they have or not is a private matter between them, but I thought it might stop me getting the blame of things I was(and am..to the best of my knowledge) completely innocent of. Bringing Nigel into the mix BTW doesn't wash...I am NOT him(nor vice versa)so I don't know what he "thinks" or how he responds to posts...if you want to carry out some kind of personal vendetta...please don't involve me..he is(I assume) more than cabable of speaking up for himself. I will make a simple further request to the moderators..please if I have posted ANYTHING offensive(whether accidently or "deemed" deliberate) please point it out to me and I will retract, apologise unreservedly and furthermore avoid repeating said action...if nothing of an offensive nature has been posted please point it out to those who continue to demean my postings by trying to scare me from expressing ANY opinion, just because it doesn't toe their particular party line!!Thank you! Reply | with quote | Posted by Resonox 21st July 2010ce 09:59 In reply to: Re: hmmm. Name-calling but trying to blame others! (Mustard) |
Messages in this topic: |
|