(appologies for the rant, it's not aimed at anybody just a general frustration at the archaeological world in general)
100% with you on that Chris.
Recent shenanigans at Bluehenge, Silbury and now possibly Marden, where everything is/was hush hush until the local 'expert' gets his or her book on the shelves illustrates the point. Let's hope these people (the experts) are not writing in taxpayer's time, and at the taxpayer's expense, only to profit from those writings (or broadcasts) when they finally get round to sharing their findings with the public.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone 6th July 2010ce 15:05 |
Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (megadread, Jul 04, 2010, 15:26)- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (megadread, Jul 05, 2010, 14:22)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (megadread, Jul 05, 2010, 17:23)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (Chris Collyer, Jul 06, 2010, 13:07)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (Littlestone, Jul 06, 2010, 15:05)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (Chris Collyer, Jul 06, 2010, 16:19)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (megadread, Jul 06, 2010, 16:22)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (Chris Collyer, Jul 06, 2010, 18:08)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (megadread, Jul 06, 2010, 18:41)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (Rockrich, Jul 06, 2010, 21:16)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (megadread, Jul 06, 2010, 21:31)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (Rockrich, Jul 07, 2010, 06:48)
- Images (megadread, Jul 07, 2010, 12:04)
- Re: Images (tjj, Jul 07, 2010, 12:59)
- BRAC (megadread, Jul 07, 2010, 13:36)
- Re: BRAC (Chris Collyer, Jul 07, 2010, 15:00)
- Re: BRAC (megadread, Jul 07, 2010, 15:46)
- Re: BRAC (Scarysas, Aug 01, 2014, 12:26)
- Re: Images (thesweetcheat, Jul 07, 2010, 18:02)
- Re: Ecclesall woods, new RA find. ? (Scarysas, Aug 01, 2014, 12:23)
|
|