Forums | Re: sounds interesting – The Modern Antiquarian.com

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

The Modern Antiquarian

Avebury Forum

Start a topic | Search

Avebury

Re: sounds interesting

68 messages

Select a forum:

The Jersey Minx wrote:

Tiompan, it would seem that you may have slightly misunderstood what I was saying. At no stage did I intend to suggest that the claimed Earth Figure was meant to be viewed from the air or even designed from the air.
Oh and something that quite took me by surprise is that he doesn’t see the WKLB as being part of the Figure because he says it preceded it and in due course replaced it in the mindset of the people as part of a new Afterlife belief. .

Hi Jersey .Minx . My comments were based on " the combined structures and natural features as seen from above " .
There is little option to see WKLB as preceding the other monuments if we accept the current understanding re. RC dating .
What about Overton Hill ? by far the biggest component in the design yet having no explanation .

Reply | with quote

Posted by tiompan
19th April 2010ce
13:19

(The Jersey Minx, Apr 17, 2010, 11:22)

Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (tiompan, Apr 17, 2010, 12:57)
- sounds interesting (olly, Apr 17, 2010, 15:04)
  - Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 17, 2010, 15:49)
    - Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 18, 2010, 10:49)
      - Re: sounds interesting (StoneGloves, Apr 18, 2010, 13:31)
    - Re: sounds interesting (wychburyman, Apr 18, 2010, 12:29)
      - Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 18, 2010, 13:38)
        Re: sounds interesting (The Jersey Minx, Apr 19, 2010, 12:36)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 19, 2010, 13:19)
        Re: sounds interesting (The Jersey Minx, Apr 19, 2010, 15:57)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 19, 2010, 16:12)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 19, 2010, 18:53)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 19, 2010, 19:32)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 19, 2010, 19:57)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 19, 2010, 20:59)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 05:56)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 07:07)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 07:09)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 07:48)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 08:10)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 08:36)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 08:49)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 09:03)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 09:37)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 09:55)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 10:06)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 10:46)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 11:08)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 11:21)
        Re: sounds interesting (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 16:21)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 08:52)
        sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 19, 2010, 19:00)
        Re: sounds unlikely (StoneGloves, Apr 20, 2010, 12:00)
        Re: sounds unlikely (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 12:30)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 13:06)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 16:27)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 17:23)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 17:52)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 18:44)
        Re: sounds unlikely (gjrk, Apr 20, 2010, 14:19)
        Re: sounds unlikely (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 14:45)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 16:23)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 17:28)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 18:02)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 19:04)
        Re: sounds unlikely (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 20:25)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 21:38)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 20:42)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 21:34)
        Re: sounds unlikely (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 22:08)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 21, 2010, 05:50)
        Re: sounds unlikely (tiompan, Apr 21, 2010, 08:33)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 21, 2010, 08:51)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Squid Tempest, Jun 09, 2010, 13:46)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Jun 10, 2010, 08:35)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Squid Tempest, Jun 10, 2010, 08:43)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Jun 10, 2010, 14:36)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Squid Tempest, Jun 10, 2010, 15:15)
        Re: sounds unlikely (nigelswift, Jun 10, 2010, 08:44)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Jun 10, 2010, 10:25)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Jun 10, 2010, 14:33)
Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (oresaba, Jun 07, 2010, 16:58)
- Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (Sanctuary, Jun 09, 2010, 12:58)
Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (head-first, Jun 10, 2010, 13:40)
- Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (Squid Tempest, Jun 10, 2010, 15:17)
  - Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (head-first, Jun 10, 2010, 15:26)
- Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (Sanctuary, Jun 10, 2010, 17:37)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page

The Modern Antiquarian

In reply to:

1 reply:

Messages in this topic: