Forums | Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

The Modern Antiquarian

Avebury Forum

Start a topic | Search

Avebury

Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury

68 messages

Select a forum:

The Jersey Minx wrote:

The author suggests that the reader should ‘think Neolithic’ and not try to understand Avebury using modern-day thinking.
......... as seen from above, /

Neolithic hot air balloons ?
Waden Hill large shoulder/shopping bag ?
Seems to suggest that Neolithic man (the gender ) was as unaware of a certain aspect of the female anatomy as his more modern brothers .

Reply | with quote

Posted by tiompan
17th April 2010ce
12:57

(The Jersey Minx, Apr 17, 2010, 11:22)

Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (tiompan, Apr 17, 2010, 12:57)
- sounds interesting (olly, Apr 17, 2010, 15:04)
  - Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 17, 2010, 15:49)
    - Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 18, 2010, 10:49)
      - Re: sounds interesting (StoneGloves, Apr 18, 2010, 13:31)
    - Re: sounds interesting (wychburyman, Apr 18, 2010, 12:29)
      - Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 18, 2010, 13:38)
        Re: sounds interesting (The Jersey Minx, Apr 19, 2010, 12:36)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 19, 2010, 13:19)
        Re: sounds interesting (The Jersey Minx, Apr 19, 2010, 15:57)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 19, 2010, 16:12)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 19, 2010, 18:53)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 19, 2010, 19:32)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 19, 2010, 19:57)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 19, 2010, 20:59)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 05:56)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 07:07)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 07:09)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 07:48)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 08:10)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 08:36)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 08:49)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 09:03)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 09:37)
        Re: sounds interesting (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 09:55)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 10:06)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 10:46)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 11:08)
        Re: sounds interesting (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 11:21)
        Re: sounds interesting (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 16:21)
        Re: sounds interesting (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 08:52)
        sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 19, 2010, 19:00)
        Re: sounds unlikely (StoneGloves, Apr 20, 2010, 12:00)
        Re: sounds unlikely (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 12:30)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 13:06)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 16:27)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 17:23)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 17:52)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 18:44)
        Re: sounds unlikely (gjrk, Apr 20, 2010, 14:19)
        Re: sounds unlikely (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 14:45)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 16:23)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 17:28)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 18:02)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 19:04)
        Re: sounds unlikely (nigelswift, Apr 20, 2010, 20:25)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 21:38)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Apr 20, 2010, 20:42)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 20, 2010, 21:34)
        Re: sounds unlikely (tiompan, Apr 20, 2010, 22:08)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 21, 2010, 05:50)
        Re: sounds unlikely (tiompan, Apr 21, 2010, 08:33)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Apr 21, 2010, 08:51)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Squid Tempest, Jun 09, 2010, 13:46)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Jun 10, 2010, 08:35)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Squid Tempest, Jun 10, 2010, 08:43)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Jun 10, 2010, 14:36)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Squid Tempest, Jun 10, 2010, 15:15)
        Re: sounds unlikely (nigelswift, Jun 10, 2010, 08:44)
        Re: sounds unlikely (Sanctuary, Jun 10, 2010, 10:25)
        Re: sounds unlikely (juamei, Jun 10, 2010, 14:33)
Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (oresaba, Jun 07, 2010, 16:58)
- Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (Sanctuary, Jun 09, 2010, 12:58)
Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (head-first, Jun 10, 2010, 13:40)
- Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (Squid Tempest, Jun 10, 2010, 15:17)
  - Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (head-first, Jun 10, 2010, 15:26)
- Re: Interesting New Book on Avebury (Sanctuary, Jun 10, 2010, 17:37)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page

The Modern Antiquarian

In reply to:

1 reply:

Messages in this topic: