tonyh wrote: Personaly, I don't think that the glaciation theory should be judged on whether large stone can be or have been moved by Human effect.
The question is, could they have been moved by glaciation? I haven't read anything that shows not so far. Probability? difficult to say really, but can't see any reason to dismiss the idea.
Tony
To ignore the possibility of glaciation is as daft as to ignoring human effort /ingenuity . Unfortunately the Williams etc paper showed that the proponents of glaciation have ignored or were unaware of the examples of effort /ingenuity in Britain .
Reply | with quote | Posted by tiompan 24th June 2009ce 11:41 |
The Blue Stone Enigma (Gwass, Jun 23, 2009, 17:05)- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Gwass, Jun 23, 2009, 17:28)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (moss, Jun 24, 2009, 06:26)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Pete G, Jun 24, 2009, 10:35)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (sleeptowin, Jun 24, 2009, 15:57)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (megadread, Jun 24, 2009, 16:45)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (tonyh, Jun 24, 2009, 17:38)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (GordonP, Jun 30, 2009, 20:32)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (tonyh, Jun 30, 2009, 20:51)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Pete G, Jun 30, 2009, 21:32)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (megadread, Jun 30, 2009, 23:16)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (goffik, Jul 01, 2009, 10:06)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (tonyh, Jul 23, 2009, 15:16)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Pete G, Jun 25, 2009, 02:35)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Rolling Ronnie, Jul 03, 2009, 10:33)
- Stonehenge: Merlin's magic Stones (Littlestone, Jul 21, 2009, 21:01)
|
|