tiompan wrote: nigelswift wrote: Here's some fantastic stuff by Mike Pitts, comparing the viewsheds from the Avenue route with those from the computed "least energy" route!
http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue11/reviews/pitts.html
Hundreds of monuments are visible from both, making any analysis impossible (I'd have thought}, but he does observe that from the least energy route...
"the strong sense that on the Avenue route you are being encouraged to see the landscape with a steady anti-clockwise sweep from east to west - mirroring the daily passage of the sun in the sky - is absent."
How good is that as a bit of work?!
Vince Gaffney et al are the ones who should get the credit for that .
btw maybe I should point out that I , or anybody else that I can think of have ever suggested that the E-W and river sections of the Stonehenge avenue have any astro connections , it is only the "leg" approaching the monument that does .
Reply | with quote | Posted by tiompan 11th December 2008ce 09:38 |
Avebury (tiompan, Dec 10, 2008, 15:45)- Re: Avebury (moss, Dec 10, 2008, 16:24)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 10, 2008, 18:16)
- Re: Avebury (Stoneshifter, Dec 11, 2008, 08:50)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 11, 2008, 09:05)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 09:22)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 09:38)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 11, 2008, 10:11)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 10:15)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 11, 2008, 11:37)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 16:31)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 11, 2008, 16:58)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 17:14)
- Re: Avebury (jimit, Dec 11, 2008, 17:24)
- Re: Avebury (sleeptowin, Dec 12, 2008, 13:53)
- Re: Avebury (BuckyE, Dec 18, 2008, 14:42)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 20, 2008, 10:13)
|
|