tiompan wrote: ... but most importantly the sun doesn't set over the heel stone (the obvious foresight and in the middle of the avenue ) as seen from the centre of the monument , it's off by about three sun diameters to the west .
I thought that the heel stone was known to be one of a pair, now, and that the sun would have risen between them. Is this not correct?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by FourWinds
11th December 2008ce
07:15 |
Avebury (tiompan, Dec 10, 2008, 15:45)- Re: Avebury (moss, Dec 10, 2008, 16:24)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 10, 2008, 18:16)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 10, 2008, 19:06)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 10, 2008, 20:35)
- Re: Avebury (FourWinds, Dec 11, 2008, 07:15)
- Re: Avebury (Stoneshifter, Dec 11, 2008, 08:50)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 11, 2008, 09:05)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 09:22)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 09:38)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 11, 2008, 10:11)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 10:15)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 11, 2008, 11:37)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 16:31)
- Re: Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 11, 2008, 16:58)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 11, 2008, 17:14)
- Re: Avebury (jimit, Dec 11, 2008, 17:24)
- Re: Avebury (sleeptowin, Dec 12, 2008, 13:53)
- Re: Avebury (BuckyE, Dec 18, 2008, 14:42)
- Re: Avebury (tiompan, Dec 20, 2008, 10:13)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Avebury (tiompan)