"Speculative remarks such as that should at least be admitted as such."
And yet when it comes to writing archaeology books are'nt most of them based on speculation given the restricted evidence that is found in prehistory. Its fine dating pottery, bronze etc but how monuments were used in a ritual sense we have only an incomplete picture. For all the excavation at Stonehenge at the moment, the books that will be written will be dancing on the head of a pin as far as the 'real' interpretation goes.
So why can't we speculate under your rules? for a start, it would shut down quite a few megalithic forums ;)
 Reply | with quote | Posted by moss
5th September 2008ce
17:54 |
|
Head To Head 
Re: The Rotherwas Ribbon cover-up (Mortimer)