Martin wrote: Yeh, Crichton is one of the few that I can remember which has re-used both Roma dressed and Roman carved blocks. I'm sure there's a Roman fort/signal station nearby which was obviously plundered! So, yes, Crichton is post-Roman. However, there are many others which I believe are genuine IA (older?) such as Pitcur in Perthshire which has, within it, two cup and ring marked stones;
http://www.themodernantiquaria[...]ite/604/pitcur_souterrain.html
There are many otheres with cup/ring carvings, now, whether these were re-used stones of carved in-situ I guess we'll never know...
The marked rocks in souterrains like others found in association with brochs , homesteads , hill forts are almost certainly all re-used . The situation of the stones in many cases make would make it unlikely that they were carved in situ . BTW there are four marked rocks at Pitcur with a possible fifth .
Reply | with quote | Posted by tiompan 9th October 2007ce 12:25 |
Souterrains and dates (Rhiannon, Oct 08, 2007, 15:56)- Re: Souterrains and dates (tiompan, Oct 08, 2007, 16:05)
- Re: Souterrains and dates (Martin, Oct 09, 2007, 12:13)
- Re: Souterrains and dates (tiompan, Oct 09, 2007, 12:25)
- Re: Souterrains and dates (Vybik Jon, Oct 09, 2007, 13:10)
|
|