Forums | Re: Silbury's structural integrity – The Modern Antiquarian.com

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

The Modern Antiquarian

Silbury Hill Forum

Start a topic | Search

Silbury Hill

Re: Silbury's structural integrity

148 messages

Select a forum:

Skanska will have done a risk assessment beforehand I should think.

I'm sure they will have but its an assessment of risk and I doubt they can say its zero. One large area of the side of the shaft is known to have sheared away.

So how does one go about removing it? It can't be all mechanical can it?

Reply | with quote

Posted by nigelswift
7th August 2007ce
11:30

(nigelswift, Aug 01, 2007, 07:56)

Re: Silbury's structural integrity (slumpystones, Aug 01, 2007, 17:13)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (whipangel, Aug 01, 2007, 19:16)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 01, 2007, 20:27)
  - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 01, 2007, 20:30)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (tomwatts, Aug 06, 2007, 16:15)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 07, 2007, 09:31)
  - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (ocifant, Aug 07, 2007, 09:47)
    - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (tomwatts, Aug 07, 2007, 10:02)
      - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (ocifant, Aug 07, 2007, 10:43)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (tomwatts, Aug 07, 2007, 10:57)
  - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Pilgrim, Aug 07, 2007, 10:11)
    - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 07, 2007, 11:08)
      - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (tomwatts, Aug 07, 2007, 11:20)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 07, 2007, 11:30)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (tomwatts, Aug 07, 2007, 11:41)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 07, 2007, 11:46)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 07, 2007, 12:02)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 07, 2007, 13:00)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 07, 2007, 13:25)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Squid Tempest, Aug 07, 2007, 13:38)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Rockrich, Aug 07, 2007, 14:03)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 07, 2007, 14:53)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Rockrich, Aug 07, 2007, 16:46)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 07, 2007, 20:00)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (moss, Aug 07, 2007, 18:01)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Pilgrim, Aug 08, 2007, 02:18)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (tomwatts, Aug 07, 2007, 11:49)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (ocifant, Aug 07, 2007, 17:33)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 08, 2007, 09:55)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Squid Tempest, Aug 08, 2007, 10:15)
  - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 08, 2007, 11:15)
    - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 09, 2007, 07:38)
      - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 09, 2007, 10:55)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (ocifant, Aug 09, 2007, 13:23)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 09, 2007, 17:31)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (jimit, Aug 09, 2007, 17:53)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (ocifant, Aug 09, 2007, 18:11)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Robert Carr, Aug 09, 2007, 18:45)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (juamei, Aug 09, 2007, 22:35)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 14, 2007, 21:06)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Pilgrim, Aug 15, 2007, 02:34)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (moss, Aug 17, 2007, 11:45)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 21, 2007, 20:23)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Pilgrim, Aug 22, 2007, 09:28)
  - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Pilgrim, Aug 23, 2007, 06:45)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Pilgrim, Aug 30, 2007, 02:15)
  - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Aug 30, 2007, 10:04)
  - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Aug 31, 2007, 18:59)
    - Update 15: (Warning: this post mentions chalk) (Pilgrim, Sep 01, 2007, 10:50)
      - Re: Update 15: (Warning: this post mentions chalk) (Littlestone, Sep 01, 2007, 16:30)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Sep 05, 2007, 20:20)
Update 16 available.... (Pilgrim, Sep 05, 2007, 20:30)
- Re: Update 16 available.... (Littlestone, Sep 06, 2007, 07:32)
  - Re: Update 16 available.... (ocifant, Sep 06, 2007, 08:46)
    - Re: Update 16 available.... (Pete G, Sep 07, 2007, 14:47)
  - Re: Update 16 available.... (tuesday, Sep 19, 2007, 13:10)
    - Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Sep 19, 2007, 20:18)
      - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (tuesday, Sep 20, 2007, 06:20)
        Re: Silbury's structural integrity (StoneGloves, Sep 20, 2007, 07:06)
        Want One! (Pilgrim, Sep 20, 2007, 07:15)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (moss, Sep 12, 2007, 16:09)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Sep 19, 2007, 13:00)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (goffik, Sep 19, 2007, 13:03)
  - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (jimit, Dec 05, 2007, 10:34)
    - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Dec 05, 2007, 10:54)
    - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Dec 05, 2007, 11:30)
      - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (nigelswift, Dec 05, 2007, 11:38)
      - Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Dec 06, 2007, 12:42)
    - Two more bits of information slip out (nigelswift, Dec 06, 2007, 19:42)
Silbury's just fine, honest. (nigelswift, Dec 19, 2007, 16:03)
- Re: Silbury's just fine, honest. (Littlestone, Dec 19, 2007, 18:19)
- Well, when I say fine.... (nigelswift, Dec 20, 2007, 11:31)
  - Re: Well, when I say fine.... (jimit, Dec 20, 2007, 13:23)
    - Re: Well, when I say fine.... (ocifant, Dec 20, 2007, 14:14)
    - Re: Well, when I say fine.... (Littlestone, Dec 20, 2007, 14:20)
      - Re: Well, when I say fine.... (Littlestone, Dec 20, 2007, 21:54)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (jimit, Dec 23, 2007, 17:37)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (nigelswift, Dec 23, 2007, 18:28)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (nigelswift, Dec 24, 2007, 07:25)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (nigelswift, Dec 24, 2007, 07:48)
      - Re: Well, when I say fine.... (moss, Dec 29, 2007, 13:59)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (nigelswift, Dec 29, 2007, 17:18)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (jimit, Dec 29, 2007, 18:03)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (jimit, Dec 29, 2007, 18:50)
        Well done EH and all concerned (fitzcoraldo, Dec 29, 2007, 21:32)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Littlestone, Dec 29, 2007, 21:38)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 21:42)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Pete G, Dec 29, 2007, 21:49)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 22:11)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Littlestone, Dec 29, 2007, 22:12)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 22:24)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Littlestone, Dec 29, 2007, 22:33)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 23:14)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Pete G, Dec 29, 2007, 22:46)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 23:22)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Littlestone, Dec 30, 2007, 11:35)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (fitzcoraldo, Dec 30, 2007, 13:05)
        This man speaks sense (juamei, Dec 30, 2007, 17:44)
        Re: This man speaks sense (tjj, Dec 30, 2007, 18:45)
        Re: This man speaks sense (tpiafc, Dec 31, 2007, 11:11)
        Re: This man speaks sense (fitzcoraldo, Dec 31, 2007, 13:02)
        Re: This man speaks sense (tpiafc, Dec 31, 2007, 14:00)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (Littlestone, Dec 30, 2007, 23:21)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (tpiafc, Dec 31, 2007, 11:07)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (moss, Dec 31, 2007, 11:48)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (tpiafc, Dec 31, 2007, 14:29)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (tomwatts, Dec 31, 2007, 18:26)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (tjj, Dec 31, 2007, 18:51)
        Re: Asking pertinent questions (tjj, Jan 01, 2008, 23:13)
        Re: Asking pertinent questions (moss, Jan 02, 2008, 09:24)
        Re: Well done EH and all concerned (jimit, Dec 30, 2007, 11:35)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (Littlestone, Dec 29, 2007, 20:12)
        Sell 'em on eBay! (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 21:06)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Pete G, Dec 29, 2007, 21:13)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 21:20)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 21:20)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Paulus, Dec 29, 2007, 21:21)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (moss, Dec 30, 2007, 07:49)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Paulus, Dec 30, 2007, 16:07)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Littlestone, Dec 30, 2007, 17:36)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Paulus, Dec 30, 2007, 19:23)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Littlestone, Dec 30, 2007, 19:46)
        Re: Sell 'em on eBay! (Paulus, Dec 30, 2007, 19:53)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (StoneGloves, Dec 30, 2007, 06:08)
        Re: Well, when I say fine.... (Paulus, Dec 30, 2007, 19:27)
Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (Littlestone, Jan 29, 2008, 17:36)
- Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (FourWinds, Jan 29, 2008, 18:01)
  - Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (Littlestone, Jan 29, 2008, 18:12)
    - Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (Wild Wooder, Jan 30, 2008, 06:15)
      - Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (moss, Jan 30, 2008, 08:08)
        Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (nigelswift, Jan 30, 2008, 08:38)
        Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (jimit, Jan 30, 2008, 08:45)
        Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (Moth, Jan 30, 2008, 10:26)
        Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (nigelswift, Jan 30, 2008, 11:05)
        Re: Last glimpse inside ancient enigma (Mustard, Jan 30, 2008, 09:38)
- newsnight film (Rhiannon, Jan 30, 2008, 16:07)
  - Re: newsnight film (Littlestone, Jan 30, 2008, 17:41)
    - Re: newsnight film (tomwatts, Jan 30, 2008, 19:09)
      - Re: newsnight film (Littlestone, Jan 30, 2008, 21:33)
        Re: newsnight film (Spaceship mark, Jan 31, 2008, 13:34)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (Littlestone, Apr 07, 2008, 18:51)
It seems to be finished... (moss, Apr 29, 2008, 06:17)
- Re: It seems to be finished... (Rhiannon, Apr 29, 2008, 09:34)
- Re: It seems to be finished... (Pilgrim, May 12, 2008, 15:26)
  - Dancing across the site (Littlestone, May 12, 2008, 15:51)
Re: Silbury's structural integrity (scubi63, May 06, 2008, 11:17)
- Re: Silbury's structural integrity (goffik, May 06, 2008, 14:57)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page

The Modern Antiquarian

In reply to:

1 reply:

Messages in this topic: