The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   General Discussion Forum Start a topic | Search
The Modern Antiquarian
Re: Oi, PAS!
207 messages
Select a forum:
cymap wrote:
Just what I would like to see , some quoted sources for those figures. Until then they are speculative and flawed its as simple as that. I am not the one or organisation who is building a campaign quoting figures so I dont have to prove anything.

But as I said, the PAS apparently already HAS such figures because they have informed the world that last year they fulfilled their fifth aim. Cymap, just drop them a line and get them to release the official figures and we can all see whether the HA figures were unduly cautious or not.

But there is a difference between saying HA's figures ARE flawed (your initial reaction), and saying that their basis needs to be published, so people can judge for themselves the likelihood that the represent a realistic picture or not (what you are saying now). I am sure all in good time you will see the reasoning behind those figures.


 This topic is locked
Posted by Paul Barford
31st May 2007ce
19:04

In reply to:

Re: Oi, PAS! (cymap)

1 reply:

Re: Oi, PAS! (kevmar)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page