Littlestone wrote:
A 'degenerate dead religion' sounds like an oxymoron (you might have a dead religion, or a degenerate religion, but perhaps not both at the same time). And if the 'bones' are made of plaster is it not reasonable to assume that they are casts taken from originals? That being the case, the original bones should be (lying ;-) around somewhere. Or has said museum lost said originals? In which case perhaps you should be directing your displeasure in the direction of said 'degenerate' museum for not protecting our heritage (by mislaying said bones) rather than towards said 'degenerate religious group'.
Dashed good reasoning Holmes!
This topic is locked | Posted by Cursuswalker 19th February 2007ce 17:10 |
Pathetic Avebury protest (Pete G, Jan 30, 2007, 18:59)- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Rhiannon, Jan 30, 2007, 19:37)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (andygreyweather, Feb 01, 2007, 23:07)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Cursuswalker, Feb 08, 2007, 23:48)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Pete G, Feb 09, 2007, 00:19)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Pete G, Feb 09, 2007, 00:47)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (slumpystones, Feb 09, 2007, 01:08)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Cursuswalker, Feb 09, 2007, 03:46)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (goffik, Feb 09, 2007, 10:00)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Cursuswalker, Feb 09, 2007, 08:48)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Littlestone, Feb 19, 2007, 16:52)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Cursuswalker, Feb 19, 2007, 17:10)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (bardofavebury, Apr 23, 2007, 20:43)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (konaman, Apr 23, 2007, 21:00)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Cursuswalker, Apr 23, 2007, 21:54)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Cursuswalker, Apr 23, 2007, 21:56)
- Re: Pathetic Avebury protest (Pete G, Apr 24, 2007, 00:40)
|
|